Companies are investing huge budgets in new product development and launches but an impressive number of these initiatives fail to deliver. It has been estimated that two-thirds of all new products fail within two years [1]. Whether it is completely new brand launches or brand extensions, the reasons are numerous and often the same. Some organisations have although managed to achieve more success wjen launching new products and extending into new categories. Unilever is one example. With moe than 400 brands, Unilever managed to build throughout the years some strong and global brands that demonstrated successful and thoughtful brand extension initiatives. Dove is one example.
Dove is an outstanding case study in brand extension. For decades, it was seen as little more than a cleansing product. But in the mid-80s, Dove launched its moisturising body-wash that, backed by positive clinical studies and a communications campaign featuring consumer testimonials, saw sales take off. The brand has been extending its product range ever since. During the last three years, product diversification and geographical expansion has seen Dove grow at an annual rate of nearly 30%. Now Dove is a truly global brand with a presence in more than 80 countries and huge marketing investments[2].
As far as its mission is concerned, Unilever defines it as ‘’Meeting the everyday needs of people everywhere’’. Dove, as one of the strongest brands is no exception. Its presence in the Skin, Body, Deodorant and Hair category is a strong support to this mission. Lately, Dove extended into the Firming market. Does this new extension fit with Dove as a master brand?
Dove has a strong feminine appeal that created an image of a brand that understands female body care and is perceived to respond realistically. The earlier extensions have strongly leveraged the functional promise of active moisturization and skin caring. The master brand is adding strong value by adding credible associations and contributing to the value proposition. Not only Dove as a master brand adds credibility to the extensions, but the extensions themselves seem as a self-evident move from the brand in the eye of the consumer.
However, and for a long time, Dove has mostly leveraged its functional platform to connect with its female customers. It seems to have neglected the female sensuality – the very expression of real feminity in a social context. Thus Dove needed to leverage its positioning from a functional based benefit to an emotional based benefit, i.e.: moving along the brand pyramid from bottom to top. Although, in my point of view, Dove clearly owns a more feminine image than Nivéa, it needs to create more opportunities for consumers to identify with the Dove woman through adding an element of ‘realness’. The brand can then further stretch into new categories with legitimacy and credibility.
Dove has been very successful in establishing strong values through its previous extensions. However, Unilever may have recognised that in order to sustain the growth of the brand and move further in the extension roadmap, Dove needed to move up the pyramid. Its positioning needed to move from a functional to a more beauty, hence emotional platform. Dove needed to move beyond moisturization and to occupy a place in the beauty arena.
Dove found this opportunity with the launch of the firming range. The market was satured with ''unobtainable promises'' and occupied by high premium brands, more synonym of glamour and models than real women and real beauty. Dove is not the first brand to offer firming products, but with a strong master brand to build on and a trustworthy message, it has made a position of being a trusted brand which is difficult for competitors to match. When competing in a market with many substitutes it is critical to place the product on the top of the pyramid.
Indeed, Firming cream is seen and associated with luxury type products and are priced very expensively. Moreover, the market is saturated by unobtainable promises were glamour and models are the norm. For example, L’Oréal owns the model territory and a newcomer need to find its own distinctive territory. Dove had to challenge this beauty myth and to be an alternative to the luxury creams that the expensive department stores offered From the ad campaign, the Dove woman is depicted as someone who aspires to realistic beauty. She has confidence in herself without being self-critical. The original firming market is prestigious and targeting slightly old mature wealthy woman. So, maybe Dove wanted to bring the idea of firm skin to every woman and makes the product an ‘’everyday luxury’’.
As far as the fit with the master brand is concerned, Aaker (1990)[4] argued that the basis of a good fit to both the brand and extension is provided through a meaningful association that is common to both (the brand and extension). In our case, the Dove parent brand is associated with attributes of e.g. ‘Providing soft smooth skin’, ‘using ¼ moisturising cream’. The extension into Dove firming range provides a close association in terms of similar benefits, for example, ‘firmer smoother skin’ and product attributes of ‘optimum moisturisation’ thereby providing a high fit. However, it should be noticed that Dove is moving from the ¼ moisturising cream point of difference. This is to allow the brand to further extend into related categories without necessarily building on the moisturising claim and to enhance the emotional positioning of the brand.
The entry of Dove into the firming range category provides a ‘fit’ for the customer from the existing body care, deodorant and hair range into the firming range building on existing benefits and features of ‘superior performance’, ‘honesty’ and ‘credibility’. When introducing the Dove firming lotion for example, brand managers at Unilever can alter the consumer’s perception of fit. This can be increased through advertising that builds upon the existing Dove association with strong feminine appeal, while distancing the extension from the association of ‘cleansing or being ‘soap-like. This helps reducing the risk associated with the purchase of a brand extension and strengthens the parent brand (DelVecchio, 2000)[5].
However, the firming market is used to the science jargon. L’Oréal for example makes a point of claiming anti-cellulite and firming treatment with the use of L’Oréal Perfect Slim. Nivéa claims a firmer skin in 2 weeks with the use of the Nivéa Firming Lotion Q1O thanks to the dual action Co-Enzymes Q10 plus R. Dove’s positioning on the other hand is very different. Not only has Dove positioned the range on an emotional platform rather than the market’s traditional rules, but it has also changed its own traditional way of positioning the brand. By pursuing this strategy, Dove could be taking a big risk. Will the risk pay off or not can only be discovered in the future.
[ For more information about the Dove brand, the firming range or simply about Unilever, please visit the following websites:
www.dove.co.uk www.dovefirmfriends.co.uk www.unilever.com www.unilever.com/brands/hpc/dove.asp ]
-------------------------------------------
[1]Schneider, J., The Launch: Why New Products Blast Off or Fizzle, Visions Magazine, http://www.pdma.org/visions/jan02/launch.html
[2] In 2002, Unilever planned to spend more £37m on Dove in the UK. Source: Marketing Week, 7th November 2002
www.unilever.com, June 2003
[4] Aaker D (1990) Brand Extensions: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, Sloan Management Review, Summer 1990
[5] DelVecchio, D; (2000), Moving Beyond fit: the role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluations of brand reliability, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol 9, 457-471
This paper was written as part of my MBA studies with a group of 4 other students that I deeply thank !
Commentaires