quepenser

Dimanche 26 juin 2005

Le Kiosque à journaux, Le Cannibale, Le Plombier ...et j'en passe...Ca ne vous dit rien?! Ce sont les différents thèmes des pubs de la nouvelle marque de téléphonie mobile de M6 (la petite chaîne qui monte...), M6Mobile by Orange ! Des spots de 15 et 35'' dans un plan média en bêton (surtout sur M6 - hasard?!!) pour annoncer cette nouvelle marque. Mais de quoi il s'agit? Selon le site m6mobile.m6.fr, l'offre M6 Mobile est une offre :

  • de forfait bloqué et tout compris (?)
  • avec des appels illimités vers les numéros orange et m6 mobile de 20h45 à minuit
  • rechargeable en cas de besoin
  • avec ou sans engagement.

Décryptage: C'est un forfait qui est bien entendu destiné aux ''djeunes'' :)...Une opération séduction avec des appels gratuits le soir vers les potos avec carte Orange et/ou M6 mobile, des SMS gratuits, des forfaits bloqués...et des services de divertissement exclusifs. Rien de révolutionnaire pour Orange, leader du marché français en téléphonie mobile. Il est vrai que ce forfait est le seul à offrir les appels illimités gratuits, mais avait Orange besoin de M6 pour commercialiser une telle offre?

Cette opération de co-branding (M6 n'est pas un MVNO) profite, à mon avis, plus à M6 qu'à Orange. L'image de marque de M6 gagnerait en profondeur (connotation jeune, technologique...)  et celle d'Orange? On peut croire que l'objectif des 100.000 clients abonnés d'içi la à fin de l'année augmentera la base de clientèle d'Orange. Mais avec plus de 50% de parts de marché et l'expertise marketing sur ce marché, nous ne pouvons pas croire qu'Orange avait vraiment besoin de M6, à moins que...l'idée serait de développer - à moyen terme - un portail exclusivement basé sur les programmes de divertissement M6  !!!

Mais encore une fois, M6 n'est pas leader sur son marché, et il serait plus intéressant de cibler une clientèle jeune large pour commercialiser une offre tournée vers le divertissement avec à la clé des appels illimités ...simplement by Orange :)

 

 

Par F2M
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires - Recommander
Mardi 28 juin 2005

Companies are investing huge budgets in new product development and launches but an impressive number of these initiatives fail to deliver. It has been estimated that two-thirds of all new products fail within two years [1]. Whether it is completely new brand launches or brand extensions, the reasons are numerous and often the same. Some organisations have although managed to achieve more success wjen launching new products and extending into new categories. Unilever is one example. With moe than 400 brands, Unilever managed to build throughout the years some strong and global brands that demonstrated successful and thoughtful brand extension initiatives. Dove is one example.

Dove is an outstanding case study in brand extension. For decades, it was seen as little more than a cleansing product. But in the mid-80s, Dove launched its moisturising body-wash that, backed by positive clinical studies and a communications campaign featuring consumer testimonials, saw sales take off. The brand has been extending its product range ever since. During the last three years, product diversification and geographical expansion has seen Dove grow at an annual rate of nearly 30%. Now Dove is a truly global brand with a presence in more than 80 countries and huge marketing investments[2].

As far as its mission is concerned, Unilever defines it as ‘’Meeting the everyday needs of people everywhere’’. Dove, as one of the strongest brands is no exception. Its presence in the Skin, Body, Deodorant and Hair category is a strong support to this mission. Lately, Dove extended into the Firming market. Does this new extension fit with Dove as a master brand?

Dove has a strong feminine appeal that created an image of a brand that understands female body care and is perceived to respond realistically. The earlier extensions have strongly leveraged the functional promise of active moisturization and skin caring. The master brand is adding strong value by adding credible associations and contributing to the value proposition. Not only Dove as a master brand adds credibility to the extensions, but the extensions themselves seem as a self-evident move from the brand in the eye of the consumer.

However, and for a long time, Dove has mostly leveraged its functional platform to connect with its female customers. It seems to have neglected the female sensuality – the very expression of real feminity in a social context. Thus Dove needed to leverage its positioning from a functional based benefit to an emotional based benefit, i.e.: moving along the brand pyramid from bottom to top. Although, in my point of view, Dove clearly owns a more feminine image than Nivéa, it needs to create more opportunities for consumers to identify with the Dove woman through adding an element of ‘realness’. The brand can then further stretch into new categories with legitimacy and credibility.

Dove has been very successful in establishing strong values through its previous extensions. However, Unilever may have recognised that in order to sustain the growth of the brand and move further in the extension roadmap, Dove needed to move up the pyramid. Its positioning needed to move from a functional to a more beauty, hence emotional platform. Dove needed to move beyond moisturization and to occupy a place in the beauty arena. 

Dove found this opportunity with the launch of the firming range. The market was satured with ''unobtainable promises'' and occupied by high premium brands, more synonym of glamour and models than real women and real beauty. Dove is not the first brand to offer firming products, but with a strong master brand to build on and a trustworthy message, it has made a position of being a trusted brand which is difficult for competitors to match. When competing in a market with many substitutes it is critical to place the product on the top of the pyramid.

Indeed, Firming cream is seen and associated with luxury type products and are priced very expensively. Moreover, the market is saturated by unobtainable promises were glamour and models are the norm. For example, L’Oréal owns the model territory and a newcomer need to find its own distinctive territory. Dove had to challenge this beauty myth and to be an alternative to the luxury creams that the expensive department stores offered  [3]From the ad campaign, the Dove woman is depicted as someone who aspires to realistic beauty. She has confidence in herself without being self-critical. The original firming market is prestigious and targeting slightly old mature wealthy woman. So, maybe Dove wanted to bring the idea of firm skin to every woman and makes the product an ‘’everyday luxury’’.

 

 

As far as the fit with the master brand is concerned, Aaker (1990)[4] argued that the basis of a good fit to both the brand and extension is provided through a meaningful association that is common to both (the brand and extension).  In our case, the Dove parent brand is associated with attributes of e.g. ‘Providing soft smooth skin’, ‘using ¼ moisturising cream’. The extension into Dove firming range provides a close association in terms of similar benefits, for example, ‘firmer smoother skin’ and product attributes of ‘optimum moisturisation’ thereby providing a high fit. However, it should be noticed that Dove is moving from the ¼ moisturising cream point of difference. This is to allow the brand to further extend into related categories without necessarily building on the moisturising claim and to enhance the emotional positioning of the brand.

The entry of Dove into the firming range category provides a ‘fit’ for the customer from the existing body care, deodorant and hair range into the firming range building on existing benefits and features of ‘superior performance’, ‘honesty’ and ‘credibility’. When introducing the Dove firming lotion for example, brand managers at Unilever can alter the consumer’s perception of fit. This can be increased through advertising that builds upon the existing Dove association with strong feminine appeal, while distancing the extension from the association of ‘cleansing or being ‘soap-like.  This helps reducing the risk associated with the purchase of a brand extension and strengthens the parent brand (DelVecchio, 2000)[5]

However, the firming market is used to the science jargon. L’Oréal for example makes a point of claiming anti-cellulite and firming treatment with the use of L’Oréal Perfect Slim. Nivéa claims a firmer skin in 2 weeks with the use of the Nivéa Firming Lotion Q1O thanks to the dual action Co-Enzymes Q10 plus R. Dove’s positioning on the other hand is very different. Not only has Dove positioned the range on an emotional platform rather than the market’s traditional rules, but it has also changed its own traditional way of positioning the brand. By pursuing this strategy, Dove could be taking a big risk. Will the risk pay off or not can only be discovered in the future.    

[ For more information about the Dove brand, the firming range or simply about Unilever, please visit the following websites:

www.dove.co.uk                                                                                                                          www.dovefirmfriends.co.uk                                                                                                                    www.unilever.com                                                                                              www.unilever.com/brands/hpc/dove.asp ]

-------------------------------------------

[1]Schneider, J., The Launch: Why New Products Blast Off or Fizzle, Visions Magazine, http://www.pdma.org/visions/jan02/launch.html

[2] In 2002, Unilever planned to spend more £37m on Dove in the UK. Source: Marketing Week, 7th November 2002

[3] www.unilever.com, June 2003

[4] Aaker D (1990) Brand Extensions: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, Sloan Management Review, Summer 1990

[5] DelVecchio, D; (2000), Moving Beyond fit: the role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluations of brand reliability, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol 9, 457-471

This paper was written as part of my MBA studies with a group of 4 other students that I deeply thank !

 

 

 

 

 

 

Par F2M
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 22 août 2005

et ce pour dire que je viens de revenir des vacances et que je vous retrouverai bientôt sur mon blog :)

Bonne fin d'été !

 
Par F2M
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires - Recommander
Mardi 29 novembre 2005
Je suis finalement soulagée...Je viens de soutenir mon mémoire de fin d'étude du DEA en Recherche Marketing à La Sorbonne ! C'est la raison pour laquelle je me suis si longtemps absentée de mon blog car - comme vous pouvez l'imaginer - travailler sur son mémoire de fin d'étude n'est pas souvent une partie de plaisir :) Néanmois, cette expérience m'a tout de même permise de me familiariser avec les logiciels SPSS et AMOS. Enfin bref...je m'accorde une petite pause bien méritée et je reviens en force avec plein de nouvelles idées pour mon blog....A ciao bonsoir :)
Par F2M
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 0 commentaires - Recommander
Vendredi 27 janvier 2006

Le site brandchannel.com vient de dévoiler son classement des marques ayant eu ''le plus d'impact'' sur les répondants au courant de l'année 2005.  La marque Google, qui vient en tête de liste pour le classement international,  illustre bien la tendance: c'est la forte présence de marques technologiques dans le top 10 de ce classement. En effet, les marques Google, Apple, Skype, Nokia, Yahoo!, Firefox,
ebay et Sony dominent le top 10 avec une peite intrusion aux 4ème et 5ème places de l'américain Starbucks et du suédois Ikea...

Il est vrai que ces marques sont bien connues du grand public mais ce classement basé sur la notion d'impact est peu claire à mon avis. Dans la section méthodologie, brandchannel.com ne donne pas une définition précise de ce mot. Il ne fait que souligner le fait que lelot ''impact'' peut avoir une connotation positive ou négative. L'exemple d'Enron est cité comme une marque ayant eu un impact négatif.

Cette ambiguité autour de la notion d'impact peut amoindrir la fiabilité des résultats. Proposer au niveau du mini-questionnaire une petite liste d'attributs référant à la notion d'impact, peut changer et même donner plus de sens à ces résultats.

Pour consulter les résultats de l'étude:

http://www.brandchannel.com/start1.asp?fa_id=298

 

Par F2M
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les 1 commentaires - Recommander

Calendrier

Novembre 2009
L M M J V S D
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
<< < > >>

Recherche

Créer un blog sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus